Finding neverland michael jackson

Prøv Podimo gratis i 30 dager 🙌
Finn din neste nye favorittpodkast og lydbok.

Episoder

• In this final episode of our rebuttal, we circle back to Part 1 in our series, focusing on how Think Twice doesn't follow journalism fairness standards and rigorously challenge their presumption of guilt.

  You'll hear examples of applying a "consider the opposite" approach to the Michael Jackson allegations, by asking what else has to be true if he were innocent.

  We invite hosts Leon Neyfakh and Jay Smooth to engage with innocence advocates. We also put forward an alternative response to the driving question behind Think Twice: Why are we still listening to Michael Jackson?
  
  Website:
  Twitter: @Case4Innocence
  
  For all our source material, please visit our website.

  You can reach out to us with any questions or comments through our website or on Twitter.

• In this episode, we present a few more examples of how the narrative in Think Twice is one-sided and slan